You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fot the record I think we should either decide to adapt #22511 soon, or soon come up with an consensus about an alternative repr to be implemented. The current MultiIndex repr is really, really (really!) bad for large indexes and needs to be be changed.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As I mentioned in #22511 (comment), the repr for MultiIndex ATM uses
labels
, even though the parameter/attribute has been changed tocodes
.This PR changes the repr, so it uses
codes
.Fot the record I think we should either decide to adapt #22511 soon, or soon come up with an consensus about an alternative repr to be implemented. The current MultiIndex repr is really, really (really!) bad for large indexes and needs to be be changed.